Peer Review Policy & Process

Inovasi Lokal is committed to the highest standards of scholarly integrity and scientific rigor. We employ a stringent, double-blind peer-review process fully aligned with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines. This multi-stage evaluation ensures methodological soundness, ethical compliance, and clinical relevance while maintaining editorial efficiency.

Key Characteristics of Our Review Process


Rigorous Pre-Screening

All manuscripts undergo strict desk review for scope, plagiarism (max 15%), and EQUATOR checklist compliance before reviewer assignment.


Minimum Two Independent Reviewers

Every research article is evaluated by at least two subject-matter experts with verified Scopus/ORCID profiles.


Double-Blind Anonymity

Both author and reviewer identities are strictly concealed throughout the evaluation to ensure absolute objectivity.

Professional Proofreading

Accepted manuscripts undergo professional language copyediting to meet international publication standards.

The 7-Stage Review Journey

 
1

Pre-Review & Desk Screening

The Managing Editor conducts an initial check for scope alignment, formatting compliance, and plagiarism screening (Turnitin/iThenticate, max 15% overall similarity). The editor also verifies the submission of the appropriate EQUATOR reporting checklist (e.g., STROBE, PRISMA, CARE). Manuscripts failing this stage receive an immediate desk rejection.

 Estimated time: 3–5 working days

2

Reviewer Assignment

The Editor-in-Chief invites a minimum of two independent expert reviewers with relevant subject-matter expertise. Reviewers are selected based on their publication track record (Scopus/WoS) and must declare no conflicts of interest.

 Estimated time: 5–7 working days

3

Double-Blind Peer Review

Reviewers evaluate the manuscript using our standardized evaluation rubric, assessing originality, methodological rigor, ethical compliance, and clarity. For complex studies, a dedicated statistical review may be requested.

 Estimated time: 14–21 working days

4

Editorial Decision

Based on the reviewers' reports, the Editor-in-Chief issues one of four decisions:

  •  Accept: Proceed directly to production.
  •  Minor Revision: Small, straightforward corrections required.
  •  Major Revision: Substantial methodological or structural changes needed (requires re-review).
  •  Reject: Does not meet the journal's scientific or ethical standards.</3>

 Estimated time: 3–5 working days

5

Author Revision & Re-Review

Authors must revise the manuscript and submit a detailed, point-by-point response letter addressing every reviewer comment. The revised manuscript is typically sent back to the original reviewers for verification.

 Author revision time: 14–28 days (varies)

6

Final Acceptance & Language Proofreading

Once scientifically accepted, the manuscript undergoes professional copyediting and English language proofreading by our editorial staff or certified services to ensure it meets international readability standards.

 Estimated time: 7–10 working days

7

Production & Online Publication

The final article is typeset, assigned a permanent DOI, and enriched with metadata (Crossref, ORCID, ROR). It is then published online with immediate Open Access and submitted to indexing databases (Google Scholar, Garuda, Dimensions, etc.).

 Estimated time: 7–14 working days post-acceptance


Total Estimated Timeline

First Decision

21 – 35 Days

Acceptance to Publication

7 – 14 Days

Total End-to-End

6 – 10 Weeks

*(Excluding author revision time)*